Under Davis' proposal entry-level teachers earning about $35,000 per year would save about $500 in state income tax, while more experienced teachers who earn in the neighborhood of $50,000 per year would save approximately $1,350. This sounds good on the surface; however, the amounts involved actually will be less because teachers will no longer receive a deduction for state income tax payments on their federal tax returns. In addition, the tax break would not be reflected in either benefit levels or in contributions to the teachers' retirement system.
However, there are additional problems with Davis' proposal. First, it singles out one group of public employees1 for a benefit not enjoyed by others. Second, it will likely lead to demands from other groups of public employees for similar benefits. Third, it basically treats teachers like charity cases. The proposal is a subtle confirmation of what everyone in the state capitol already knows; namely, that teachers are woefully underpaid compared to other professionals with similar educational backgrounds. In California most prison guards, who need only a high school diploma, get paid significantly more than teachers.
Rather than pit one group of public employees against another with this unwise tax break, the IP suggests that the appropriate course of action for the governor and the state legislature would be to raise teacher salaries to acceptable levels. Doing so would attract more highly qualified individuals to the profession.
If you agree with
the Irascible Professor on this issue, send a message to Governor Davis
Let him know that we need to pay public school teachers decent salaries.
1In the interests of full disclosure, the Irascible Professor is employed by the California State University system; and, thus is a state employee. However, you can rest assured that his views on this issue have not be colored by that relationship.
Printer friendly version
| web rings |
Professor invites your comments.
©2000 Dr. Mark H. Shapiro - All rights reserved.